editor decision started nature rejection

volume5,page 917 (2002)Cite this article. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. Dealing With a Negative Editorial Decision. Editorial process : Springer Support Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. - If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. I submitted a paper in a journal. It's showing under consideration for In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. and JavaScript. No news is good news? To complicate matters further, editors must base their decisions on evidence that is never completely reliable. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. //-->Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 5 Answers. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Click to reveal Internet Explorer). If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. b. I regret giving them his address. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Second reason: methodological approach and results. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript . [CDATA[> Improve this answer. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. //-->What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. ]]> When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. Prophecies Fulfilled: The Qur'anic Arabs in the Early 600s Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. ]]> Sovereignty - Wikipedia So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. [CDATA[// >Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. How did it go for you after this? No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. . Answer (1 of 4): Hi! To obtain Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? This will reduce delays. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7a2b13d3eec43de7 Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Stage 2: Editor assigned. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . good . Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. General Average and Risk Management in Medieval and Early Modern By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. AE stands for Associate Editor. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. Production Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Share your stories! editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. [CDATA[// >Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 5 Answers. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Click to reveal Internet Explorer). If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. b. I regret giving them his address. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Second reason: methodological approach and results. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript . [CDATA[> Improve this answer. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. //-->What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. ]]> When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. Prophecies Fulfilled: The Qur'anic Arabs in the Early 600s Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. ]]> Sovereignty - Wikipedia So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. [CDATA[// >Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. How did it go for you after this? No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. . Answer (1 of 4): Hi! To obtain Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? This will reduce delays. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7a2b13d3eec43de7 Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Stage 2: Editor assigned. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . good . Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. General Average and Risk Management in Medieval and Early Modern By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. AE stands for Associate Editor. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. Production Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Share your stories! editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. [CDATA[// >Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. 5 Answers. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Click to reveal Internet Explorer). If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. b. I regret giving them his address. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Manuscript Status Tables Part 2 - Notes from the JGR-Space Physics Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. Second reason: methodological approach and results. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript . [CDATA[> Improve this answer. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. //-->What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made !1997 F350 XLT 4x4 Crew Cab (4 door) 7.3 Liter V-8 Diesel Powerstroke, Automatic with overdrive, Dana 60 front axle, Weld Racing Wheels and Toyo Open Country Radials (tires and wheels cost $4500) only 66,000 original miles Located in Seattle Washington 98188 1 mile from Seatac AirportI . For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. ]]> When a journal displays the decision in process status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. Prophecies Fulfilled: The Qur'anic Arabs in the Early 600s Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. ]]> Sovereignty - Wikipedia So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. The reviewing process may normally take from 4 to 10 weeks, although during the pandemic longer times are common. This is also the time for the "desk review by the editor," though, and so it probably took 2 weeks for the editor to decide to decline it. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. [CDATA[// >Ellie Bergstrom, PhD on Twitter Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. How did it go for you after this? No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. . Answer (1 of 4): Hi! To obtain Editorial processes are described for the following stages: Atsubmission | Aftersubmission | Afteracceptance. What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission and publication. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? This will reduce delays. Cloudflare Ray ID: 7a2b13d3eec43de7 Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. Browse other questions tagged, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Stage 2: Editor assigned. The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. The first step in making the right decision is recognizing the problem or opportunity and deciding to address it. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . good . Will contact my PI if it doesn't change to "decision sent to author" in the next few days. If your paper has been under review before this, then it stands a better chance of getting accepted. We may reverse decisions in cases where a referee (or editor) has made a serious error of fact, but only if the error was crucial to the decision. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. General Average and Risk Management in Medieval and Early Modern By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. AE stands for Associate Editor. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees. Production Did this satellite streak past the Hubble Space Telescope so close that it was out of focus? It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. Many submissions are declined without being sent for review. Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Share your stories! editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com Editors encourage authors in highly technical disciplines to provide a slightly longer summary paragraph that descries clearly the basic background to the work and how the new results have affected the field, in a way that enables nonspecialist readers to understand what is being described. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. 'We regret to inform you'that your scientific manuscripts will be The short answer to your lead-off question is, I think, no. Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. Manuscript submitted exactly 2 months ago. [CDATA[// >